Betting on sport is substantial company.
Sport England approximates the worth of spending on sport-related gaming in England grew from ₤ 1.7 bn in 1985 to ₤ 2.8 bn in 2008.
And that figure is likely to have actually grown further, with an estimated ₤ 1bn bet on the World Cup alone in the UK this summertime.
Meanwhile, German research study company Sport & Markt estimates the overall worldwide gaming market will be worth 263bn euros (₤ 220bn) by 2012, with much of that driven by internet and sports betting.
But when the integrity of events are hit the gambling industry suffers, and incomes are put under threat if consumers can not bet with self-confidence.
And there can have been few higher-profile sport betting stories than those impacting cricket and snooker this year.
High-profile
As Sport & Markt’s Gareth Moore observes: “Everyone discuss the sports betting gambling market now.
“Not only is it a significant market in world service, it is one that is now on the front pages of papers.”![Register at Bet9ja using the promotion code YOHAIG for a N100,000 welcome bonus]()
Four Pakistan cricketers have actually been questioned by police over spot-fixing accusations connecting to a test versus England at Lord’s last month.
Three of these players have actually stated they will also challenge the corruption charges mounted versus the trio by the sport governing body the International Cricket Council.
Meanwhile, three-times snooker world champion John Higgins was cleared of match-fixing allegations, however was banned recently for six months for stopping working to report the unlawful method to him to toss frames.
There are also two other continuing investigations – not related to Mr Higgins – into snooker.
‘Honest’
David O’Reilly is legal counsel for Betfair, one of the UK’s biggest online sporting exchanges.
“If the sport is perceived as truthful, straight and fair that benefits betting companies because people will spend cash betting with confidence,” he states.
“If you take the Pakistan accusations, although unassociated to the UK controlled betting industry … it is not actually a favorable story for betting in the UK.
“That is due to the fact that the perception is that ‘cricket is now something we might need to beware about’.”
‘Education’
So what can be done to prevent future scandals?
According to professionals at a World Sports Law Report conference into sports betting, the focus needs to be on sportspersons and sportswomen.
As Simon Taylor of the Professional Players’ Federation points out: “The only individuals who can repair a match are the rivals or the referee.”
His organisation represents men and females in 15 sports betting in the UK, being an umbrella organisation for all gamer organisations, such as the Professional Footballers’ Association.
He believes that it is not adequate to simply have deterrents, sanctions and disciplinary procedures, however that the method to take on potential problems around players is also through education.
Mr Taylor says rules need to be explained clearly to players with clear examples, and by people they appreciate.
“Through educating players about sports betting you strengthen integrity which is in everybody’s interest,” he adds.
“If gamers are harder to corrupt then sport will be harder to corrupt.”
‘Brand damage’
Matt Johnson, head of regulative legal suggestions at the Football Association, agrees.
“Prevention is much better than remedy, and we also make a point of telling gamers ‘you are going to be caught’.”
“It is important that sport is straight, and is seen to be directly,” he adds.
“If it loses that then people don’t desire to bet, that is not in gaming firms’ interests, and it is not in our interests.”
He stated that as soon as a great track record was lost, the damage to a sport was “enormous”.
FA guidelines mean gamers are not allowed to wager on a competitors in which they are involved.
Mr Johnson says players need to be seen not to be capitalizing any inside knowledge, which he states might cause “brand damage” to football and its competitions.
So, even a 2nd Division player knocked out of the FA Cup in the autumn can not bank on a Manchester United v Chelsea cup final the following spring.
“We have to overcome to players the reputational risk to the game,” he says. “Once confidence has actually been damaged it is difficult to get it back – mud sticks.”
‘Overwhelmingly legal’
If this represents the “carrot” approach, then maybe Nick Tofiluk, director of policy at the Gambling Commission, represents the “stick”.
The Gambling Commission was established under the Gambling Act 2005 to manage business gambling in Great Britain.
An ex-chief constable of West Midlands authorities, Mr Tofiluk has responsibility for policing all betting in the UK apart from spread wagering, which is the remit of the FSA.
“The overwhelming bulk of sports wagering happening through UK operators is legal and fair,” he says.
“But for some there is the temptation to … corruptly disrupt the outcome of a sporting occasion.
“Such cheating has the prospective to weaken the integrity of a sport, and it also damages the business interests of sports bodies and sports wagering.”
The commission has actually developed an in-house Sports Betting Intelligence Unit to receive and disseminate information to sporting authorities, wagering companies and policing authorities.
“Since 2007 we have experienced a significant insight into world of corrupt sports betting wagering,” he says.
“We will inform sports betting of our issues, to help prevent or curtail [illegal] activity”
In May 2010, the commission also introduced a private telephone hotline for those with details or suspicions.
‘Vulnerabilities’
But in a two-and-a-half year duration there has been just one criminal prosecution, a 24-year-old guy who was cautioned for unfaithful in relation to greyhound racing.
However, Mr Tofiluk says there are still 8 continuous examinations, and that much useful information has actually also been passed to sports authorities.
He stated that where an investigation by a sport governing body was quicker, and more cost effective, then the commission would consider stopping a criminal examination “in favour of letting sports betting governing bodies take the lead”.
Meanwhile, he says numerous of those aiming to cheat the sports betting industry were experienced about sports betting and sporting individuals, and about betting operations and the motion of cash.
“They seek out the vulnerabilities of these to help in their business.”

Sport England approximates the worth of spending on sport-related gaming in England grew from ₤ 1.7 bn in 1985 to ₤ 2.8 bn in 2008.
And that figure is likely to have actually grown further, with an estimated ₤ 1bn bet on the World Cup alone in the UK this summertime.
Meanwhile, German research study company Sport & Markt estimates the overall worldwide gaming market will be worth 263bn euros (₤ 220bn) by 2012, with much of that driven by internet and sports betting.
But when the integrity of events are hit the gambling industry suffers, and incomes are put under threat if consumers can not bet with self-confidence.
And there can have been few higher-profile sport betting stories than those impacting cricket and snooker this year.
High-profile
As Sport & Markt’s Gareth Moore observes: “Everyone discuss the sports betting gambling market now.
“Not only is it a significant market in world service, it is one that is now on the front pages of papers.”
Four Pakistan cricketers have actually been questioned by police over spot-fixing accusations connecting to a test versus England at Lord’s last month.
Three of these players have actually stated they will also challenge the corruption charges mounted versus the trio by the sport governing body the International Cricket Council.
Meanwhile, three-times snooker world champion John Higgins was cleared of match-fixing allegations, however was banned recently for six months for stopping working to report the unlawful method to him to toss frames.
There are also two other continuing investigations – not related to Mr Higgins – into snooker.
‘Honest’
David O’Reilly is legal counsel for Betfair, one of the UK’s biggest online sporting exchanges.
“If the sport is perceived as truthful, straight and fair that benefits betting companies because people will spend cash betting with confidence,” he states.
“If you take the Pakistan accusations, although unassociated to the UK controlled betting industry … it is not actually a favorable story for betting in the UK.
“That is due to the fact that the perception is that ‘cricket is now something we might need to beware about’.”
‘Education’
So what can be done to prevent future scandals?
According to professionals at a World Sports Law Report conference into sports betting, the focus needs to be on sportspersons and sportswomen.
As Simon Taylor of the Professional Players’ Federation points out: “The only individuals who can repair a match are the rivals or the referee.”

His organisation represents men and females in 15 sports betting in the UK, being an umbrella organisation for all gamer organisations, such as the Professional Footballers’ Association.
He believes that it is not adequate to simply have deterrents, sanctions and disciplinary procedures, however that the method to take on potential problems around players is also through education.
Mr Taylor says rules need to be explained clearly to players with clear examples, and by people they appreciate.
“Through educating players about sports betting you strengthen integrity which is in everybody’s interest,” he adds.
“If gamers are harder to corrupt then sport will be harder to corrupt.”
‘Brand damage’
Matt Johnson, head of regulative legal suggestions at the Football Association, agrees.
“Prevention is much better than remedy, and we also make a point of telling gamers ‘you are going to be caught’.”
“It is important that sport is straight, and is seen to be directly,” he adds.
“If it loses that then people don’t desire to bet, that is not in gaming firms’ interests, and it is not in our interests.”
He stated that as soon as a great track record was lost, the damage to a sport was “enormous”.
FA guidelines mean gamers are not allowed to wager on a competitors in which they are involved.
Mr Johnson says players need to be seen not to be capitalizing any inside knowledge, which he states might cause “brand damage” to football and its competitions.
So, even a 2nd Division player knocked out of the FA Cup in the autumn can not bank on a Manchester United v Chelsea cup final the following spring.
“We have to overcome to players the reputational risk to the game,” he says. “Once confidence has actually been damaged it is difficult to get it back – mud sticks.”
‘Overwhelmingly legal’
If this represents the “carrot” approach, then maybe Nick Tofiluk, director of policy at the Gambling Commission, represents the “stick”.
The Gambling Commission was established under the Gambling Act 2005 to manage business gambling in Great Britain.
An ex-chief constable of West Midlands authorities, Mr Tofiluk has responsibility for policing all betting in the UK apart from spread wagering, which is the remit of the FSA.
“The overwhelming bulk of sports wagering happening through UK operators is legal and fair,” he says.
“But for some there is the temptation to … corruptly disrupt the outcome of a sporting occasion.
“Such cheating has the prospective to weaken the integrity of a sport, and it also damages the business interests of sports bodies and sports wagering.”
The commission has actually developed an in-house Sports Betting Intelligence Unit to receive and disseminate information to sporting authorities, wagering companies and policing authorities.
“Since 2007 we have experienced a significant insight into world of corrupt sports betting wagering,” he says.
“We will inform sports betting of our issues, to help prevent or curtail [illegal] activity”
In May 2010, the commission also introduced a private telephone hotline for those with details or suspicions.

‘Vulnerabilities’
But in a two-and-a-half year duration there has been just one criminal prosecution, a 24-year-old guy who was cautioned for unfaithful in relation to greyhound racing.
However, Mr Tofiluk says there are still 8 continuous examinations, and that much useful information has actually also been passed to sports authorities.
He stated that where an investigation by a sport governing body was quicker, and more cost effective, then the commission would consider stopping a criminal examination “in favour of letting sports betting governing bodies take the lead”.
Meanwhile, he says numerous of those aiming to cheat the sports betting industry were experienced about sports betting and sporting individuals, and about betting operations and the motion of cash.
“They seek out the vulnerabilities of these to help in their business.”
Please login or Register to submit your answer